Job Mix Formulation for Bituminous Concrete Grade II Using C# Programming
Bituminous Concrete mix design is a complex process and different methods are proposed by a number of researchers. Marshall’s method of mix design is one such process, which became very popular among the practitioners in India and elsewhere. SUPERPAVE method of mix design which takes into account climatic and traffic factors for aggregate and binder selection. It has gained its prominence and is observed to be superior to any other well-known mix design processes. Aggregate gradation adopted for the mix design plays a crucial role in the performance of the mix. Many researchers have developed mechanisms to work out Job Mix Formulations (JMF) so as to reach the appropriate aggregate mix in the field.
The analytical phase of JMF deals with the method of blending of aggregates from the identified stockpiles in order to fulfill the requirements of gradation as specified by agencies for a given layer of flexible pavements. Methods proposed for aggregate blending includes the graphical methods, trial and error method and optimization techniques. The aim of these techniques is two-fold; the first is to optimize the cost involved in blending from the known unit cost of individual stockpiles; and the other is to fulfill the gradation recommendations of the local agencies and parameters suggested in other methods. In this research, an attempt has been made to develop C# (C-Sharp) application in .NET framework using the sequential search technique to work out the best blend of aggregate particles by ensuring the requirements mentioned in MoRTH’s (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, India) recommended practice. Bailey’s method and the maximum density line have been recommended in 0.45 power chart and incorporating optimization criteria. Grade II bituminous concrete has been chosen for the research. It was clearly observed that the fine aggregate fraction in the stockpiles influences the final Job Mix Formulation. The devleloped tool can accommodate up to 5 stockpiles. It was also observed that the Bailey’s requirements are more stringent when compared with MoRTH requirements as far as JMF is considered. The developed tool is capable of generating the blends with Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) aggregate blends.
Y. H. Haung, Pavement Analysis and Design, 2nd ed, Pearson Education, USA.
Active Standard, “Standard test method for marshall stability and flow of asphalt mixtures,” West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
T. N. Mansour, Bradley J. Putman, “Influence of aggregate gradation on the performance properties of porous asphalt mixtures,” Journal of Materials Civil Engineering, vol. 25, no.2, pp. 281-288, 2013.
Cooley Jr, L A. Zhang, Jianping, Kandhal, P. S. Hand, A. J. Epps Martin A, “Significance of restricted zone in superpave aggregate gradation specification,” Transportation Research Circular No. E-C043, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.
R. J. Hyndman, A. B. Koehler, “Another look at measures of forecast accuracy,”. International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 679-688, 2006.
B. E. Ruth et al, “Aggregate gradation characterization factors and their relationships to fracture energy and failure strain of asphalt mixtures,” Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies. vol. 71, pp. 310-344, 2002.
H. Liu, P. Hao and J. Xu, “Effects of nominal maximum aggregate size on the performance of stone matrix asphalt,” Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 126, 2017.
Mario T. Tabiucanon, P. Adulbhan, Stephen and S. Y. Chen, “A probabilistic programming model for blending aggregates,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 4, pp. 257-260, 1979.
The Asphalt Institute, “Mix design methods for asphalt concrete and other hot-mix types,” MS-2 (4th edn), Maryland, 1974.
W. R. Vavrik, “Bailey method for gradation selection in hot-mix asphalt design transportation research circular,” TRB Circular Number E-C044, 2002.
Specifications for Base and Surface Course, Section 500, Materials for Structures, MoRTH, Government of India, 2015.
W. R. Vavrik, W. J. Pine, G. Huber, S. H. Carpenter and R. Bailey, “The bailey method of gradation evaluation: the influence of aggregate gradation and packing characteristics on voids in the mineral aggregate,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, vol. 70, pp. 132-175, 2001.
W. R. Vavrik, W. J. Pine and S. H. Carpenter, “Aggregate blending for asphalt mix design: the bailey method,” Presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., vol. 1789, pp. 146-153, 2002.
W. R. Vavrik, “Quality control of hot-mix asphalt: controlling aggregate interlock through the bailey method,” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Quality Control and Quality Assurance of Construction Materials, Dubai Municipality, United Arab Emirates, 2001.
Copyright (c) 2019 Proceedings of Engineering and Technology Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors can retain copyright in their article with no restrictions. Also, author can post the final, peer-reviewed manuscript version (postprint) to any repository or website.
From Oct. 01, 2015, PETI will publish new articles with Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License.
The Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-NC) License permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes