Innovation Management in Services Industries: The Impacts of Innovative Capacity and Transformative Learning

  • Wen-Hai Chih
  • Ling-Chu Huang
  • Tsung-Ju Yang

Abstract

This study highlights the innovation management and learning perspective of a firm’s innovative capability. The model proposed in this study examines the relationships among competence exploitation, competence exploration, transformative learning, innovation, and performance. This study presents empirical results from 225 service industry in Taiwan. First, the innovative capability factors positively affect transformative learning include competence exploitation and competence exploration. Transformative learning in turn has positive effects both on innovation and performance. Secondly, the rank order effects on innovation are competence exploitation, competence exploration, and transformative learning, respectively. The rank order effects on performance are competence exploration, competence exploitation, and transformative learning, respectively. Finally, transformative learning is the mediating effect of competence exploitation and competence exploration on innovation and performance.

References

A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 41-50, 1985.

A. H. Kirca, S. Jayachandran, and W. O. Bearden, “Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 24-41, 2005.

C. Argyris, “Double loop learning in organizations,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 115-25, 1977.

C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39-50, 1981.

C. III O’Reilly and M. L. Tushman, “The ambidextrous organization,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 74-81, 2004.

D. Leonard-Barton, “Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, special issue, pp. 111-125, 1992.

D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, “The myopia of learning,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, special issue, pp. 95-112, 1993.

E. H. Schein, “Organizational Culture and Leadership,” San Francisco, 1985.

E. W. Anderson, C. Fornell, and R. T. Rust, “Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services,” Marketing Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 129-145, 1997.

G. S. Day, “The capabilities of market-driven organizations,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 37-52, 1994.

G. T. M. Hult and D. J. Ketchen, “Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 899-906, 2001.

J. C. Nunnally, “Psychometric Theory,” New York, 1978.

J. M. Sinkula, “Market information processing and organizational learning,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 35-45, 1994.

J. S. Armstrong and T. S. Overton, “Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 396-402, 1977.

K. Atuahene-Gima, “Resolving the capability: Rigidity paradox in new product innovation,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 61-83, 2005.

P. J. Lane, B. R. Koka, and S. Pathak, “The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 833-863, 2006.

P. R. Dickson, “Toward a general theory of competitive rationality,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 69-83, 1992.

R. Garud and P. R. Nayyar, “Transformative capacity: continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 365-385, 1994.

R. Reed and R. DeFillippi, “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 88-102, 1990.

R. F. Hurley and G. T. M. Hult, “Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 42-54, 1998.

S. A. Zahra and G. George, “Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension,” Academy of Management, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 185-203, 2002.

S. C. Lee, H. Liang, and C. Y. Liu, “The effects of absorptive capacity, knowledge sourcing strategy and alliance forms on firm performance,” Service Industries Journal, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 2421-2440, 2010.

S. F. Slater and J. C. Narver, “Market-oriented is more than being customer-led,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1165-1168, 1999.

S. F. Slater and J. C. Narver, “Market orientation and the learning organization,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 63-74, 1995.

S. J. Bell, G. J. Whitwell, and B. A. Lukas, “Schools of thought in organizational learning,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 70-86, 2002.

T. Levitt, “Marketing success through differentiation of anything,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 83-91, 1980.

U. Lichtenthaler, “Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 822-846, 2009.

W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128-152, 1990.

Published
2015-11-01
How to Cite
Chih, W.-H., Huang, L.-C., & Yang, T.-J. (2015). Innovation Management in Services Industries: The Impacts of Innovative Capacity and Transformative Learning. Proceedings of Engineering and Technology Innovation, 1, 5-9. Retrieved from http://ojs.imeti.org/index.php/PETI/article/view/263
Section
Articles