Design Philosophy for Buildings’ Comfort-Level Performance

  • Nanang Gunawan Wariyatno Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia; Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Han Ay Lie Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Fu-Pei Hsiao National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Tainan, Taiwan
  • Buntara Sthenly Gan Department of Architecture, College of Engineering, Nihon University, Koriyama, Japan
Keywords: comfort-level, seismic intensity level (SIL), quantification, earthquake, design philosophy


The data reported by Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) show that the fatal casualties and severe injuries are due to heavy shaking during massive earthquakes. Current earthquake-resistant building standards do not include comfort-level performance. Hence, a new performance design philosophy is proposed in this research to evaluate the quantitative effect of earthquake-induced shaking in a building. The earthquake-induced response accelerations in a building are analysed, and the response accelerations related with the characteristic property of the building are used to evaluate the number of Seismic Intensity Level (SIL). To show the indispensability of the newly proposed comfort-level design philosophy, numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the comfort level on different floors in a building. The results show that the evaluation of residents’ comfort levels should be considered in the current earthquake-resistant building design codes.


“Lists, Maps, and Statistics,”, 2018.

“Major Earthquakes That Occurred Near Japan (Since 1996),”, 2018. (In Japanese)

K. Ishibashi, “Status of Historical Seismology in Japan,” Annals of Geophysics, vol. 47, no. 2-3, pp. 339-368, 2004.

“Seismic Intensity and Acceleration,”, 2018. (In Japanese)

H. Kawasumi, “Measures of Earthquake Danger and Expectancy of Maximum Intensity throughout Japan as Inferred from the Seismic Activity in Historical Times,” Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, vol. 29, pp. 469-482, 1951.

S. Maruyama, Y. S. Kwon, and K. Morimoto, “Seismic Intensity and Mental Stress after the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake,” Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 165-169, October 2001.

M. Takegami, Y. Miyamoto, S. Yasuda, M. Nakai, K. Nishimura, H. Ogawa, et al., “Comparison of Cardiovascular Mortality in the Great East Japan and the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquakes—A Large-Scale Data Analysis of Death Certificates,” Circulation Journal, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 1000-1008, 2015.

L. A. Dengler and J. W. Dewey, “An Intensity Survey of Households Affected by the Northridge, California, Earthquake of 17 January 1994,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 441-462, 1998.

M. Teguh, “Structural Behaviour of Precast Reinforced Concrete Frames on a Non-Engineered Building Subjected to Lateral Loads,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 152-164, February 2016.

W. T. Lin, T. L. Weng, and E. T. Chang, “Deterioration Estimation of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures Using Material Testing Data Base,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 22-37, January 2019.

R. Hore, S. Chakraborty, A. M. Shuvon, and M. A. Ansary, “Effect of Acceleration on Wrap Faced Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall on Soft Clay by Performing Shaking Table Test,” Proceedings of Engineering and Technology Innovation, vol. 15, pp. 24-34, April 2020.

K. R. Karim and F. Yamazaki, “Correlation of JMA Instrumental Seismic Intensity with Strong Motion Parameters,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1191-1212, May 2002.

K. T. Shabestari and F. Yamazaki, “Attenuation Relationship of JMA Seismic Intensity Using JMA Records,” 10th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, 1998, pp 529-534.

A. Tan and A. Irfanoglu, “Correlation between Ground Motion Based Shaking Intensity Estimates and Actual Building Damage,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, September 2012, pp. 28588-28597.

N. Gunawan, A. Han, and B. S. Gan, “Proposed Design Philosophy for Seismic-Resistant Buildings,” Civil Engineering Dimension, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-5, March 2019.

O. Kamigaichi, “JMA Earthquake Early Warning,” Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 134-137, 2004.

V. Sokolov, T. Furumura, and F. Wenzel, “On the Use of JMA Intensity in Earthquake Early Warning Systems,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 767-786, 2010.

V. Y. Sokolov, “Seismic Intensity and Fourier Acceleration Spectra: Revised Relationship,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 161-187, February 2002.

D. J. Dowrick, G. T. Hancox, N. D. Perrin, and G. D. Dellow, “The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 193-205, September 2008.

M. Grigoriu, “Do Seismic Intensity Measures (IMs) Measure Up?” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 46, pp. 80-93, October 2016.

K. T. Shabestari and F. Yamazaki, “A Proposal of Instrumental Seismic Intensity Scale Compatible with MMI Evaluated from Three-Component Acceleration Records,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 711-723, November 2001.

H. O. Wood and F. Neumann, “Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 277-283, December 1931.

K. Du, B. Ding, W. Bai, J. Sun, and J. Bai, “Quantifying Uncertainties in Ground Motion-Macroseismic Intensity Conversion Equations: A Probabilistic Relationship for Western China,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 24, pp. 1-25, May 2020.

E. F. Deng, L. Zong, Y. Ding, Z. Zhang, J. F. Zhang, F. W. Shi, et al., “Seismic Performance of Mid-to-High Rise Modular Steel Construction—A Critical Review,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 155, 106924, October 2020.

K. Kostinakis, I. K. Fontara, and A. M. Athanatopoulou, “Scalar Structure-Specific Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Assessing the Seismic Performance of Structures: A Review,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 630-665, 2018.

K. A. Porter, “An Overview of PEER’s Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology,” 9th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, July 2003, pp. 1-8.

Y. Chen, P. Avitabile, and J. Dodson, “Data Consistency Assessment Function (DCAF),” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 141, 106688, July 2020.

Y. Chen, P. Avitabile, C. Page, and J. Dodson, “A Polynomial Based Dynamic Expansion and Data Consistency Assessment and Modification for Cylindrical Shell Structures,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 154, 107574, 2021.

Y. Chen, D. Joffre, and P. Avitabile, “Underwater Dynamic Response at Limited Points Expanded to Full-Field Strain Response,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 140, no. 5, 051016, October 2018.

M. Beer, I. A. Kougioumtzoglou, E. Patelli, and S. K. Au, Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.

Y. Chen, P. Logan, P. Avitabile, and J. Dodson, “Non-Model Based Expansion from Limited Points to an Augmented Set of Points Using Chebyshev Polynomials,” Experimental Techniques, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 521-543, October 2019.

S. Günay and K. M. Mosalam, “PEER Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology, Revisited,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 829-858, 2013.

“Seismic Intensity Level and Acceleration, Weather and Earthquakes, Seismic Intensity Information 2003,”, 2020.

How to Cite
N. G. Wariyatno, H. A. Lie, F.-P. Hsiao, and B. S. Gan, “Design Philosophy for Buildings’ Comfort-Level Performance”, Adv. technol. innov., May 2021.