Forward Kinematics Based Prediction for Bending Motion of Soft Pneumatic Actuators with Various Air Chambers

Authors

  • Do Phuoc Thien Industrial Maintenance Training Center, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Le Hoai Phuong Industrial Maintenance Training Center, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46604/peti.2023.10536

Keywords:

soft robotic, pneumatic actuator, forward kinematics, flexible finger, DH parameter

Abstract

This study proposes a forward kinematic model for soft actuators that utilize pneumatic control to predict their bending motion, which is simulated using Ansys software. Firstly, a bending motion test is conducted with a 2-air chamber actuator to derive an equation that establishes the relationship between the bending angle and input pressure. Next, a serial model for the overall soft actuator is developed using forward kinematics with the DH method. The angle variables in the soft actuator are then replaced with an equation that relates the deformed angle and compressed air. Finally, the proposed serial model is used to predict the bending motion of 4-air and 6-air chamber actuators, and the results are compared to simulations and real experiments. The comparison shows that the proposed model could accurately predict the bending motion of the real actuators within an acceptable tolerance of 10%.

References

P. H. Le, T. P. Do, and D. B. Le, “A Soft Pneumatic Finger with Different Patterned Profile,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 577-582, October 2021.

H. Marvi, G. Z. Lum, and I. D. Walker, “Opportunities and Challenges in Soft Robotics,” Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 2, no. 6, June 2020.

P. T. Do, D. T. Vo, and H. P. Le, “A Soft Pneumatic Robotic Glove for Hand Rehabilitation after Stroke,” 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pp. 7-12, January 2022.

M. Xie, M. Zhu, Z. Yang, S. Okada, and S. Kawamura, “Flexible Self-Powered Multifunctional Sensor For Stiffness-Tunable Soft Robotic Gripper by Multimaterial 3D Printing,” Nano Energy, vol. 79, article no. 105438, January 2021.

Z. Wang, T. Hirata, T. Sato, T. Mori, M. Kawakami, H. Furukawa, et al., “A Soft Robotic Hand Based on Bellows Actuators for Dishwashing Automation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2139-2146, April 2021.

L. Xiaohui, Z. Liping, and Z. Wei, “Hook-Shaped Bending and S-Shaped Bending of Soft Robotic Arm,” 4th International Conference on Robotics and Automation Sciences, pp. 1-5, June 2020.

H. Wang, M. Totaro, and L. Beccai, “Toward Perceptive Soft Robots: Progress and Challenges,” Advanced Science, vol. 5, no. 9, September 2018.

Z. Wang, K. Or, and S. Hirai, “A Dual-Mode Soft Gripper for Food Packaging,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 125, article no. 103427, March 2020.

M. T. Thai, P. T. Phan, T. T. Hoang, H. Low, N. H. Lovell, and T. N. Do, “Design, Fabrication, and Hysteresis Modeling of Soft Microtubule Artificial Muscle (SMAM) for Medical Applications,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5089-5096, July 2021.

Z. Wang and S. Hirai, “Soft Gripper Dynamics Using a Line-Segment Model with an Optimization-Based Parameter Identification Method,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 624-631, April 2017.

H. Al-Fahaam, S. Davis, and S. Nefti-Meziani, “The Design and Mathematical Modelling of Novel Extensor Bending Pneumatic Artificial Muscles (EBPAMS) for Soft Exoskeletons,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 99, pp. 63-74, January 2018.

S. Luo, M. Edmonds, J. Yi, X. Zhou, and Y. Shen, “Spline-Based Modeling and Control of Soft Robots,” IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, pp. 482-487, July 2020.

M. E. M. Salem, Q. Wang, and M. H. Xu, “Application of Neural Network Fitting for Modeling the Pneumatic Networks Bending Soft Actuator Behavior,” Engineering Research Express, vol. 4, no. 1, article no. 15032, March 2022.

C. R. Rocha, C. P. Tonetto, and A. Dias, “A Comparison Between the Denavit–Hartenberg and The Screw-Based Methods Used in Kinematic Modeling of Robot Manipulators,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 723-728, August 2011.

C. Faria, J. L. Vilaca, S. Monteiro, W. Erlhagen, and E. Bicho, “Automatic Denavit-Hartenberg Parameter Identification for Serial Manipulators,” 45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 610-617, October 2019.

I. M. Meththananda, S. Parker, M. P. Patel, and M. Braden, “The Relationship Between Shore Hardness of Elastomeric Dental Materials and Young’s Modulus,” Dental Materials, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 956-959, August 2009.

P. I. Corke, “A Simple and Systematic Approach to Assigning Denavit–Hartenberg Parameters,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 590-594, June 2007.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-28

How to Cite

[1]
Do Phuoc Thien and Le Hoai Phuong, “Forward Kinematics Based Prediction for Bending Motion of Soft Pneumatic Actuators with Various Air Chambers”, Proc. eng. technol. innov., vol. 24, pp. 41–52, Apr. 2023.

Issue

Section

Articles